Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-CF-1559, 99-CO-660 Bnoden v. US Nov 19, 1999 Affirmed
97-CF-233, 97-CF-647 Smith v. US Nov 18, 1999 Affirmed
98-CF-1385 Kellibrew v. US Nov 18, 1999 Affirmed
93-CF-470 Bruce W. Gilmore v. US Nov 18, 1999
98-CV-58 William R. Bond v. Lesley Ann Ivanjack. Nov 18, 1999
98-CV-434 Yolanda McDaniels v. Linda Bnoden, et al. Nov 18, 1999
97-FM-693 Sarah Clyburn v. DC Nov 18, 1999
98-AA-980 Gibson v. US Nov 17, 1999 Affirmed
98-CF-932 Rosario v. DC Police & Firefighters Retirements & Relief Board Nov 17, 1999 Affirmed
98-CF-925 Martin v. US Nov 17, 1999 Affirmed

Pagination

Total 16155 items