Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
17-CM-0578 & 19-CO-0019 Intriago v. United States May 20, 2024 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-0237 Morris v. District of Columbia May 16, 2024 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby
24-BG-0155 In re Black May 16, 2024 Per Curiam
22-TX-0610 Wong v. District of Columbia May 16, 2024 Associate Judge Howard
22-BG-0578 In re Doman May 16, 2024 Per Curiam
22-CO-0940 Maye v. United States May 16, 2024 Associate Judge Shanker
20-CF-0073 Mitchell v. United States May 09, 2024 Associate Judge Howard
14-F-0667, 14-CF-0712, 14-CF-0724 & 14-CF-1089 Williams, et al. v. United States May 09, 2024 Per Curiam; dissenting opinion by Senior Judge Fisher
22-CO-0010 Ciacci v. United States May 09, 2024 Affirmed Per Curiam
24-BG-0143 In re Sayadian May 09, 2024 Per Curiam