Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
21-CV-0545 Andrews v. DCHA Jun 06, 2024 Associate Judge Beckwith
23-CV-0440 Hsieh v. Formosan Ass'n for Public Affairs Jun 06, 2024 Senior Judge Thompson
22-CF-0960 Ward-Minor v. United States Jun 06, 2024 Senior Judge Fisher
23-AA-0054 Rieger v. D.C. DOES Jun 06, 2024 Associate Judge McLeese
23-CV-0281 Gant v. Sixteenth St. Heights Dev., LLC, et al. Jun 06, 2024 Senior Judge Washington
22-CV-0712 Loza v. D.C. OHR Jun 06, 2024 Reversed and remanded Per Curiam
22-CM-0813 White v. United States Jun 04, 2024 Affirmed and remanded in part Per Curiam
22-PR-0663 In re Wade; Chou Jun 04, 2024 Vacated in part and remanded Per Curiam
23-CO-0569 Headspeth v. United States Jun 03, 2024 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CO-0063 Mitchell v. United States May 30, 2024 Affirmed Per Curiam