Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CO-535 Caston v. United States Feb 18, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-783 Kolowski v. United States Feb 18, 2021 Associate Judge Glickman *originally issued as an MOJ 12/31/2020
19-CF-129 Gary v. United States Feb 16, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CM-588 Davis v. United States Feb 11, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-1238 Dixon v. United States Feb 11, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-1014 Hawk v. D.C. DOES Feb 11, 2021 Associate Judge McLeese
19-AA-580 CentroNia v. Smith Feb 10, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-FM-0777 Hyde v. Tocco Feb 09, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-CV-411 Zelaya v. Strange Feb 05, 2021 Affirmed in part, reversed in part Per Curiam
19-AA-44 Classic Cab v. DFHV Feb 04, 2021 Associate Judge Glickman