Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-BG-328 In re Krapacs Feb 25, 2021 Per Curiam
17-CO-441 United States v. Bumphus Feb 25, 2021 Per Curiam
17-CF-210 Ford v. United States Feb 25, 2021 Associate Judge Beckwith; Dissent by Senior Judge Nebeker
19-CV-993 Bowling v. Gurley, et al. Feb 25, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-652 Pisner v. Rubinstein Feb 25, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CM-280 Freeland v. United States Feb 24, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CO-107 McMillian v. United States Feb 24, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CM-1166 Spriggs v. United States Feb 24, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CM-866 Johnson v. United States Feb 23, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-1035 Children's National Medical Center v. D.C. DOES Feb 23, 2021 Reversed/Remanded Per Curiam