Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CV-103 Woodyard v. Wheeler Mar 18, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-534, 19-CV-642 & 19-CV-643 Ehab Asal et al. v. Estate of Mina Mar 18, 2021 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby, Dissenting in part by Associate Judge Thompson
17-CF-231 Fogg v. United States Mar 18, 2021 Chief Judge Blackburne-Rigsby, Concurring Opinion by Associate Judge McLeese
17-FS-376 In re A.T.J. & L.D.J. Mar 18, 2021 Senior Judge Fisher, Dissenting Opinion by Associate Judge Beckwith
19-CO-495 Gardner v. United States Mar 17, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-FM-939 Helfer v. Lino Mar 15, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CF-694 Anderson v. United States Mar 12, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
16-CF-822 General v. United States Mar 11, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CO-554 & 20-CO-608 Sharps and Jordan v. United States Mar 11, 2021 Associate Judge Glickman; dissent by Associate Judge Beckwith
18-AA-1077 Glover v. DC DOES Mar 10, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam