Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-BG-882 In re Glenn H. Stephens Mar 25, 2021 Associate Judge Glickman, Concurring opinion by Associate Judge Deahl, Dissenting opinion by Senior Judge Ruiz
19-CV-256 Maucha v. Bank of New York Mellon Mar 25, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CF-34 Repass v. United States Mar 25, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-PR-1022 Altevogt v. Estate of Altevogt Mar 24, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
16-CF-917 Simms v. United States Mar 24, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-AA-482 Patten v. DC DSRS Mar 23, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
16-CO-578 Allen v. United States Mar 19, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-855 Johnson v. DCHA Mar 19, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-FM-0847 & 19-FM-0848 Johnson v. Alvarez Mar 19, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CM-1088 Johnson v. United States Mar 19, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam