Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
18-CM-1306 Napper v. United States Apr 20, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-292 Rodriguez v. Knightsbridge Management, Inc. Apr 20, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CF-718 Chavis v. United States Apr 19, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CF-243 Pittman v. United States Apr 15, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-676 Ludwig & Robinson v. Biotech Pharma, LLC, et al. Apr 15, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-BG-91 In re Murphy Apr 15, 2021 Per Curiam
20-BG-757 In re Tsimpedes Apr 15, 2021 Per Curiam
21-BG-51 In re Fournier Apr 15, 2021 Per Curiam
17-CF-529 Golden v. United States   Apr 15, 2021  Associate Judge Glickman
21-BG-2 In re Smith Apr 15, 2021 Per Curiam