Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
19-CV-991 Kluft-Badway v Georgetown University May 05, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-FS-179 In re D.M. May 04, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-1249 Jordan v. Opper-Weiner May 03, 2021 Reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded Per Curiam
14-CF-237 Mills v. United States May 03, 2021 Affirmed; Reversed and remanded in part. Per Curiam
18-CM-594 Walker v. United States Apr 29, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-541 & 19-CV-906 Mingle v. Oak Street Apartments LTD, C/O CIH Apr 29, 2021 Senior Judge Ferren, Concurring Opinion by Senior Judge Ferren
19-FM-1206 Schmidt v. Bomani Apr 23, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
12-CF-1434, 12-CF-1503 & 18-CO-993 Parker & Jenkins v. United States Apr 22, 2021 Senior Judge Washington
19-CF-812 Boston v. United States Apr 22, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
16-AA-284 Chisley v. John Doe Apr 21, 2021 Reversed/Vacated Per Curiam