Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
17-BG-766 In re Rachal III Jun 10, 2021 Per Curiam
20-CM-231 Nash v. United States Jun 09, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-1107 Catlett v. DC DOES Jun 08, 2021 Vacated and Remanded Per Curiam
18-CF-535 Edwards v. United States Jun 08, 2021 Affirmed and Vacated in part, Remanded Per Curiam
18-FS-895 & 18-FS-896 In re D.B.; Da.B. & Do.B Jun 04, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-AA-858 Triad Construction Services, et al. v. D.C. DOES Jun 04, 2021 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded Per Curiam
19-CF-1066 Jones v. United States Jun 03, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
20-CO-769 Griffin v. United States Jun 03, 2021 Per Curiam
21-CO-26 & 21-CO-27 Bailey v. United States Jun 03, 2021 Per Curiam
19-CM-9 Applewhite v. United States Jun 02, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam