Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
21-BG-225 In re Tantillo Jun 17, 2021 Per Curiam
21-BG-071 In re Mowrey, III Jun 17, 2021 Per Curiam
21-BG-235 In re Love Jun 17, 2021 Per Curiam
21-BG-199 In re Izzo Jun 17, 2021 Per Curiam
21-BG-198 In re Frank Jun 17, 2021 Per Curiam
21-BG-226 In re Barnwell Jun 17, 2021 Per Curiam
19-CM-1185 Holloway v. United States Jun 16, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-CV-656 & 19-CV-689 Sindram v. Cap City Management, et al. Jun 16, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-CM-785 Young v. United States Jun 11, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam
17-BG-766 In re Rachal III Jun 10, 2021 Per Curiam