Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
20-CV-146 Kalan, M.D., v. Medstar Georgetown Medical Center, Inc. Jul 01, 2021 Associate Judge Easterly
20-CV-313 Moeller v. United States Jul 01, 2021 Associate Judge Thompson
19-CF-05 Arthur v. United States Jul 01, 2021 Associate Judge Thompson
19-AA-1143 Carden v. D.C. DOES Jul 01, 2021 Associate Judge Thompson
17-CF-685 & 17-CF-800 Crocker & Walker v. United States Jul 01, 2021 Associate Judge Glickman
20-CV-324 Wang v. 1624 U Street, Inc., et al. Jun 24, 2021 Associate Judge Deahl
18-CF-132 Grimes v. United States Jun 24, 2021 Associate Judge Deahl
20-BG-741 In re Smith Jun 24, 2021 Per Curiam
21-BG-241 In re Marks, Sr. Jun 24, 2021 Per Curiam
19-AA-703 McCrea v. D.C. Office of Tax Revenue Jun 24, 2021 Affirmed Per Curiam