Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
99-BG-1314 In the Matter of Richard A. James. Mar 23, 2000
95-AA502 Hotel Tabard Inn v. District of Columbia Department Of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs. Mar 23, 2000
94-CF-1240, 98-CO-1087 Eugene R. Busey v. United States of America. Mar 23, 2000
99-BG-229 In re Roger Michael Lindmark. Mar 23, 2000
98-CT-856 Marlowe v. DC Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Morin
98-CV-1782 Mullin v. N St. Follies Ltd. Partnership Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Graae
99-PR-308 Richardson v. Allison Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Christian
98-CF-200, 99-CO-42 Taylor v. US Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Cushenberry
99-CF-73 Stedman v. US Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Shuker
98-CM-942 Mangrum v. US Mar 22, 2000 Affirmed Morrison