Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-CM-532 Johnson v. US May 18, 2000 Affirmed Mitchell
97-CV-1805 Joseph Nelson III v. Allstate Insurance Co. May 18, 2000
98-CO-1580 US v. Darrian D. Allen. May 18, 2000
98-CV-1160 Fernando E. Miranda v. Pedro Contreras. May 18, 2000
98-CV-714 John F. Stets v. Starmanda B. Featherstone. May 18, 2000
99-CM-718 Stephen H. Snell v. US May 18, 2000
99-PR-58 In re: Estate of Allene Barnes. May 18, 2000
98-CM-866 Ware v. US May 17, 2000 Affirmed
97-CF-1206 Belle v. US May 17, 2000 Affirmed
98-CV-1922 Railan v. Law Firm of Field May 17, 2000 Affirmed