Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
97-CV-672 Richardson v. DC Human Rights & Minority Business Jun 21, 2000 Affirmed
98-CM-1737 Alexander v. US Jun 20, 2000 Affirmed
98-CM-1831 Gonzalez v. US Jun 20, 2000 Affirmed
95-CF-439+ DeLong v. US Jun 20, 2000 Affirmed
96-CM-1958 Watkins v. US Jun 20, 2000 Affirmed
95-CF-732+ Kyler v. US Jun 20, 2000 Affirmed
99-CV-831 Coleman v. Household Finance Corp. Jun 20, 2000 Affirmed
91-CF-1147+ Rhone v. US Jun 20, 2000 Affirmed
98-CV-182 Ruesch International Monetary Services, Inc. v. Dianne M. Farrington. Jun 15, 2000
97-BG-1507 In re James A. Bielec. Jun 15, 2000