Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
99-CV-202 Mitchell v. Ugwunna Jul 21, 2000 Affirmed
98-CF-501 Goosby v. US Jul 21, 2000 Affirmed
99-CV-639 Cheryl Levant v. Warren R. Whitley. Jul 20, 2000
99-SP-83 Kenneth N. Hammond v. DC Board of Parole. Jul 20, 2000
98-CF-321 David Q. Black v. US Jul 20, 2000
97-CF-1235 Caldwell v. US Jul 19, 2000 Affirmed
99-CM-661 Byrd v. US Jul 19, 2000 Affirmed
99-CV-18 Stuart v. Sorrels Jul 19, 2000 Affirmed
98-AA-1372 Williams v. DC Office of Workers Compensation Jul 19, 2000 Affirmed
99-CV-1242 Chen v. Eng Jul 19, 2000 Affirmed