Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
96-CV-1690+ DC, et al., v. Eastern Trans-Waste of Maryland, Inc., et al. Aug 10, 2000
95-CF-1742 Phillip C. Williams v. US Aug 10, 2000
99-CT-569 Bolster v. DC Aug 09, 2000 Affirmed
97-CO-281 Peters v. US Aug 09, 2000 Affirmed
98-CF-639 Fisher v. US Aug 08, 2000 Affirmed
98-CM-560 Kohlheim v. US Aug 08, 2000 Affirmed
99-CO-269 United States v. Bnoden. Aug 05, 2000
98-CV-130 Susan Bnodener v. DC Aug 03, 2000
98-CF-570 Van Quinton Leak v. US Aug 03, 2000
97-TX-479+ Ulysses G. Auger, et al. v. DC Aug 03, 2000