Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
99-CV-867 Theatre Management Group, Inc. and LWR Theatre Group v. John F. Dalgliesh Jr. Jan 18, 2001
00-BG-1637 In re Charles F. Stow III. Jan 18, 2001
00-BG-1636 In re Nelson Joel Kline. Jan 18, 2001
99-CF-1200 Glasgow v. United States Jan 17, 2001 Affirmed
99-CM-511 Lassiter v. United States Jan 17, 2001 Affirmed
99-CF-278 Fofana v. United States Jan 17, 2001 Affirmed
99-CF-1688 Strawbridge v. United States Jan 17, 2001 Affirmed
98-CF-519 Robert A. Barton & Joseph J. Gray v. United States (Order) Jan 14, 2001 Affirmed
98-CF-519 Gray v. United States Jan 12, 2001 Affirmed
98-CF-110 Barton v. United States Jan 12, 2001 Affirmed