Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
99-CV-97 Emanuel Dickey & Speedy Management Corporation v. Mary Fair. Mar 08, 2001
99-AA-1692 Joyce H. Sargent v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services. Mar 08, 2001
98-CF-1934 Bruce D. Smith. v. United States. Mar 08, 2001
98-CF-1620, 99-CF-99 Joseph Jackson & Sayzon L. Ford v. United States. Mar 08, 2001
99-CV-1495 Tomsene Blake v. Professional Travel Corporation. Mar 08, 2001
98-CO-1403 Baldwin v. United States Mar 07, 2001 Affirmed Greene
00-CV-233 Tnodeell-Harris v. Baucom Mar 07, 2001 Affirmed Bayly
99-CF-1674 Coles v. United States Mar 06, 2001 Affirmed Reid-Winston
99-CV-1017 Kim v. Demers Real Estate Mar 06, 2001 Affirmed Hedge
00-CV-60 Ibrahim v. District of Columbia Mar 06, 2001 Affirmed Hedge