Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-CF-137 Alvarenga v. United States Mar 14, 2001 Affirmed Bartnoff
99-CM-668 Panton v. United States Mar 14, 2001 Affirmed Washington
99-CV-1400 Goyal v. Homam Mar 14, 2001 Affirmed Wynn
98-CF-773 Thomasson v. United States Mar 13, 2001 Affirmed Richter
99-CF-1435 Duvall v. United States Mar 13, 2001 Affirmed Turner
98-CV-6 Davis v. Columbia Hospital for Women Mar 13, 2001 Affirmed Bowers
99-CO-1512 Davis v. United States Mar 12, 2001 Affirmed Cushenberry
98-CM-1274+ Washington v. United States Mar 09, 2001 Affirmed Hess
96-CV-1388, 96-CV-1688, 96-CV-1980, 97-CV-1205 Irene Wagner & Francis Wagner v. Georgetown University Medical Center & Arthur I. Kobrine. Mar 08, 2001
99-FM-557 William D. Primus v. Betty J. Primus. Mar 08, 2001