Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
99-CV-1487 Wade v. Winn Management Mar 15, 2001 Affirmed Richter
00-CO-535 Johnson v. United States Mar 15, 2001 Affirmed Duncan-Peters
98-CF-1124, 98-CF-1273, 98-CF-1129 James McFerguson & Dion Worthington v. United States James McFerguson v. United States. Mar 15, 2001
99-BG-54 In re Denise R. Stanley. Mar 15, 2001
99-BG-1624 In re Richard A. Canatella. Mar 15, 2001
98-CV-1757 Anita N. Washington v. H. G. Smithy Company. Mar 15, 2001
97-CF-1795 Kevin Porter v. United States. Mar 15, 2001
97-AA-1208 Tappi Small v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights. Mar 15, 2001
00-SP-150 Arthur Mason v. United States Parole Commission. Mar 15, 2001
00-CV-424 Raymond Coates v. Michelle Elzie. Mar 15, 2001