Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
99-CM-1710 Patterson v. Unites States Mar 27, 2001 Affirmed Bowers
99-CM-3025 Wong v. United States Mar 27, 2001 Affirmed Morrison
99-CM-949 Bell v. United States Mar 27, 2001 Affirmed Satterfield
00-CO-19 Bailey v. United States Mar 26, 2001 Affirmed Retchin
97-CF-1738 Fitzgerald v. United States Mar 26, 2001 Affirmed Diaz
99-CM-1247+ Yarnode v. Targum Mar 26, 2001 Affirmed Abrecht
99-FM-1327 Bernard v. Bernard Mar 23, 2001 Affirmed Mize
97-CF-1277 Balogun v. United States Mar 22, 2001 Affirmed Shuker
00-CO-386 Dada v. United States Mar 22, 2001 Affirmed Shuker
97-PR-1885, 98-PR-1070 In re Estate of Hazel M. King. Mar 22, 2001