Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
00-CF-266 Lawrence v. United States Apr 12, 2001 Affirmed Greene
00-SP-1097 Wilson v. DC Board of Parole Apr 12, 2001 Affirmed Mitchell
98-CF-1606 Rasheed Crook v. United States. Apr 12, 2001
97-BG-1927 In re Joseph A. Lopes. Apr 12, 2001
98-CV-219 Hattie Lewis v. Marvin Voss. Apr 12, 2001
00-AA-1500 Donald Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics. Apr 12, 2001
98-FS-1546, 98-FS-1547 In re D. M., Don. M. Apr 12, 2001
99-CF-153 Linda Pernell v. United States. Apr 12, 2001
99-CV-507 Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union. Apr 12, 2001
99-AA-7 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services. Apr 05, 2001