Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
98-CF-1942 Borras v. United States Apr 20, 2001 Affirmed Burgess Jr.
00-CO-246 Taylor v. United States Apr 19, 2001 Affirmed Walton
98-BG-1322 In re Charles H. Bowser. Apr 19, 2001
98-CV-210 Robert Weishapl v. Joseph Sowers. Apr 19, 2001
99-CM-1100 Dixon v. United States Apr 18, 2001 Affirmed Satterfield
98-CF-1515 Battle v. United States Apr 17, 2001 Affirmed Richter
99-CF-244 Butler v. United States Apr 17, 2001 Affirmed Beck
98-CF-772 Major v. United States Apr 17, 2001 Affirmed Shuker
97-CF-2030 Simms v. United States Apr 13, 2001 Affirmed Huvelle/Broderick
99-CV-339 Lewin v. Capital Children's Museum Apr 12, 2001 Affirmed Bartnoff