Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
17-PR-71 In re Lewis May 26, 2022 Senior Judge Fisher
21-SP-238 Akhmetshin v. Browder May 26, 2022 Associate Judge Beckwith; dissenting opinion by Associate Judge Glickman
22-BG-175 In re Brewster May 26, 2022 Per Curiam
19-PR-1065 In re Goodwin (Bruce E. Gardner) May 26, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
21-AA-130 Lee v. D.C. Department of Employment Services May 26, 2022 Associate Judge Deahl
19-CF-778 Lovitt v. United States May 19, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-BG-749 In re Zylberglait May 19, 2022 Per Curiam
20-CO-342 Gayles v. United States May 16, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CV-930 Bender v. Mantech Inter. Corp. May 13, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam
19-AA-1213 Walsh v. D.C. Department of Employment Services May 13, 2022 Affirmed Per Curiam