Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
00-CO-1317 Holt v. United States May 29, 2001 Affirmed Mitchell-Rankin
99-CV-79, 99-CV-80 Carolyn Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (Order). May 25, 2001
00-BG-765 In re Chris H. Asher. May 24, 2001
99-FS-797 In re L.D.H., J.P.S. May 24, 2001 Affirmed Queen
97-CF-2058 Castaneda v. United States May 24, 2001 Affirmed Gardner Jr.
97-CF-280+ Marin v. United States May 23, 2001 Affirmed Kollar-Kotelly
00-CV-660 Zier v. Zawalich May 23, 2001 Affirmed Mize
98-SP-1489 Jackson v. Moore May 23, 2001 Affirmed Murphy
99-CF-1178 Mathis v. United States May 22, 2001 Affirmed Shuker
99-CF-1226 Lopez v. United States May 21, 2001 Affirmed Wynn