Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
00-AA-809 Glee v. DC DOES Jun 18, 2001 Affirmed
00-BG-967 In re John H. McDonald. Jun 14, 2001
97-CV-57 Affordable Elegance Travel, Inc. v. Worldspan, L.P. Jun 14, 2001
98-CF-110, 98-CF-519 Robert A. Barton & Joseph J. Gray v. United States (Order). Jun 14, 2001
99-CV-338 Finkelstein, Thompson & Loughran and Donald J. Enright v. Hemispherx Biopharma Inc. Jun 14, 2001
99-CO-1492+ Carter-El v. United States Jun 13, 2001 Affirmed Shuker Greene
00-CM-354 Landecho v. United States Jun 13, 2001 Affirmed Turner
99-CF-1165 Hizell v. United States Jun 13, 2001 Affirmed Milliken
99-CF-363 Bundy v. United States Jun 12, 2001 Affirmed Rankin
99-CF-1057 Okumodi v. United States Jun 12, 2001 Affirmed Morrison