Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
21-BG-0456 In re Strems May 04, 2023 Per Curiam
22-CV-0029 Johnson v. District of Columbia, et al. May 03, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
18-CF-0891 Rousseau v. United States May 02, 2023 Affirmed and Remanded Per Curiam
19-CV-0332 & 19-CV-0442 1305 Rhode Island Ave, NW v. John D. Mussells, et al. Apr 27, 2023 Senior Judge Ruiz
23-BG-0116 In re Kellogg Apr 27, 2023 Per Curiam
23-BG-0115 In re Hessel Apr 27, 2023 Per Curiam
17-FS-0344 In re A.S. Apr 27, 2023 Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded Per Curiam
21-CV-0755 Ford Law Pros, PC v. CX International, Inc. Apr 25, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-CV-0722 Washington v. Douglas & Boykin, PLLC Apr 25, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
21-FM-0061 Klisch v. Sears Apr 21, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam