Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
22-FS-0292 In re F.S. Jun 08, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
23-BG-0243 In re Libertelli Jun 08, 2023 Per Curiam
16-FM-0383 Mashaud v. Boone Jun 08, 2023 Associate Judge Deahl; dissenting opinion, with Associate Judge AliKhan concurring by Associate Judge McLeese
22-CV-0306 Carrington v. Tan Jun 05, 2023 Affirmed Per Curiam
22-FS-0557, 22-FS-0558, 22-FS-0559, 22-FS-0667 & 22-FS-0668 In re P.M.B.; J.B. Jun 01, 2023 Associate Judge Shanker
22-CV-0051 & 22-CV-0302 Garcia v. Tygier, et al. Jun 01, 2023 Senior Judge Glickman
21-FM-0737 Yeh v. Hnath May 25, 2023 Associate Judge Easterly
23-BG-0349 In re Tappan May 25, 2023 Per Curiam
19-CO-0745 Bellinger v. United States May 25, 2023 Associate Judge Deahl
23-BG-0303 In re Mack May 25, 2023 Per Curiam