Opinions and Memorandum of Judgments (MOJs)

Last Updated : 02/11/2026

About Opinions and MOJs

Opinions

The court publishes opinions in cases to provide guidance to both the litigants and the trial court or agency, and the public. Published opinions may create new law, or interpret ambiguous statutes, clarify certain rules or concepts, or otherwise be of general interest. These decisions are published in print and on the DCCA website. They are binding precedent, which means they can be cited as supporting authority in other cases.

MOJs

The court issues Memorandum Opinion and Judgments (MOJs) in cases where the decision applies established legal principles. The decisions are issued by the panel (per curiam), not under the name of an individual judge. They are not published, and except as permitted by DC App. R. 28(g), they may not be cited as supporting authority in other cases. For that reason, the court only lists online the names and case numbers of MOJs that have been issued. If a party or other interested person believes that a specific MOJ should be published, the party or interested person may file a motion to publish no later than 30 days after the MOJ issues.

Show:
Radio options
Show:
Appeal Number Case Date Disposition Judge
96-CV-1141 Robert H. Neuman v. Jerome P. Akman Aug 06, 1998
94-CF-1142, 97-CO-246 Herman Page v. United States. Aug 06, 1998
96-CF-442 Michelle Francis v. United States. Aug 06, 1998
22-BG-460 In re Resnick Per Curiam
24-BG-0354 In re Glenn, IV Per Curiam
22-BG-626 In re Hammer Per Curiam
23-CM-0868 Spriggs v. United States Affirmed Per Curiam
23-FM-0137 Alemayhu v. Folie Affirmed
25-BS-0121 In re Blakeman Suspended Per Curiam
22--FS-0138 In re T.B. Senior Judge Thompson